$DA2. 93 lt1-vette. Any advantage to centering cell boundari

Discuss General Motors (GMC, Chevy, Pontiac, Hummer, Cadillac, etc) tuning topics here. Request definitions, discuss parameters, etc.

Moderators: robertisaar, dex

Post Reply
dizwiz24
Posts: 55
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2009 6:15 pm

$DA2. 93 lt1-vette. Any advantage to centering cell boundari

Post by dizwiz24 »

Is there any advantage to setting cell boundaries such that say...highway operation (65- 80 MPH) is the middle of the boundary?

With current mods, I cruise about 2050 RPM at 65 MPH.

Also, MAP is typically (on flat road, w/ consistent throt. input): 51 to 53 kPA.
However, I see from my data that it drifted into the 40's quite often also.

BLM cell boundaries are currently listed as:

BLM Cell RPM boundaries:
low: 850
midpoint: 1200
high: 2000

BLM Cell MAP boundaries:
low: 50
midpoint: 65
high: 80
robertisaar
Author of Defs
Posts: 962
Joined: Sat Feb 21, 2009 3:18 pm
Location: Camden, MI

Post by robertisaar »

they're only BLM cells, which if the fueling is close to accurate, you can run 1 cell and have it work out just fine, i've done it for years.

RPM breakpoints seem reasonable
MAP are OK, but i would drop the low to ~40 and mid to ~60, that way there is a more even amount of area that each cell can cover.

20-40, 40-60, 60-80, 80-100
Post Reply