Search found 9 matches
- Fri Jun 22, 2018 11:14 am
- Forum: Report A Bug
- Topic: SDK up-to-date?
- Replies: 0
- Views: 5717
SDK up-to-date?
Hi, Before I dive into the actual problem - is the Plugin SDK available on the site up-to-date with the current version of TP RT? Update: OK, so the matter at hand was that I was getting an immediate TunerPro crash when compiling the sample TP plugin with mingw c++ compiler. Previously I had no prob...
- Tue Dec 19, 2017 3:01 am
- Forum: Report A Bug
- Topic: Internal pure scales skipped by Difference Tool
- Replies: 0
- Views: 6072
Internal pure scales skipped by Difference Tool
When diffing two bins with the Difference Tool, the data that belongs to an internal pure scale of a map is classified as not defined, while it would be very useful to see that it belongs to the X/Y axis of a map. A related thing, but a feature request rather than bug, it would be super cool if the ...
- Mon Apr 04, 2011 1:49 am
- Forum: Report A Bug
- Topic: S-19 Patching does not seem to work
- Replies: 6
- Views: 14092
Your crashing S19 file doesn't conform to the s-record spec. I've fixed (for the next build) my s-record importer to better catch malformed S19 files (and handle unusually large data payloads, just for fun). Meanwhile, you should fix your file. Here's more info on the file structure: http://www.ame...
- Fri Mar 25, 2011 8:08 am
- Forum: Report A Bug
- Topic: S-19 Patching does not seem to work
- Replies: 6
- Views: 14092
Sorry to say that Mark, but according to the best of my checks the checksums in this second snippet are OK (see below). So perhaps you could check your checksum caclucation routines again ;) Re crashing, this may of course depend on the the bin file being patched... $ srec_info badpatch.s19 Format&a...
- Sun Mar 20, 2011 9:31 am
- Forum: Report A Bug
- Topic: S-19 Patching does not seem to work
- Replies: 6
- Views: 14092
S-19 Patching does not seem to work
Hi, I wanted to test this feature, I loaded the .s19 file, confirmed that I indeed want to patch the bin file, but nothing happened, no error message either. This is the contents of the file I tried (created by a tool I wrote, but I did check it carefully, nothing seems to be wrong with it): S012000...
- Sun Mar 13, 2011 6:17 am
- Forum: Feature Suggestions
- Topic: New type of variable for conversions
- Replies: 0
- Views: 4867
New type of variable for conversions
Hi,
What I totally miss in conversions (all of them) is to refer to the index of the current row/column.
Cheers,
Woj
What I totally miss in conversions (all of them) is to refer to the index of the current row/column.
Cheers,
Woj
- Fri Mar 11, 2011 11:01 am
- Forum: TunerPro Discussion
- Topic: Secondary logging of AFR
- Replies: 4
- Views: 8430
So let me on this occasion also share some thoughts about ignition RT tuning. I was on steady state dyno and in fact the first (and so far the last) time in my life. What I just could not get around was watching the dyno screen, updating ignition cell (one!) back and forth, updating and checking the...
- Fri Mar 11, 2011 10:09 am
- Forum: TunerPro Discussion
- Topic: Secondary logging of AFR
- Replies: 4
- Views: 8430
- Wed Mar 09, 2011 10:20 am
- Forum: TunerPro Discussion
- Topic: Secondary logging of AFR
- Replies: 4
- Views: 8430
Secondary logging of AFR
Hi all, First of, sorry for really uninformative subject :D Second, I am new here :D Third, I did a fair bit of searching, but so far not found much on this particular subject. I am in progress of rediscovering TunerPro after the release of the new version. I just finished an adx definition for a Ma...